It opens with one of the most daring scenes I've ever encountered
at a film's beginning. It's probably not a spoiler to tell you that Drew
Barrymore's character gets killed almost immediately - that's right, the
biggest name in the cast dies before she's even earned her salary. Her
classmates from school are bombarded by the media, and our protagonist Sidney
(Neve Campbell) and her various friends and acquaintances are dragged into it
all. Then Sidney is attacked by the 'Ghostface Killer' (and yeah, you'll
recognise that iconic mask) and all her friends start becoming the targets. Could the
killer possibly be a mutual acquaintance? Could it have something to do with
the mysterious and slowly revealed pain that Sidney has experienced in her
past? And most importantly, why is her boyfriend (Skeet Ulrich) so happy while
he's not getting laid? Everyone is a suspect, and everyone is well versed with
their horror clichés. Let the party - and the excessive bloodshed - begin.
This comes from one of horror's most notorious bosses: Wes
Craven, progenitor of A Nightmare on Elm Street, The Hills Have Eyes, The Last
House on the Left and a number of sequels and other horror classics. It's
refreshing to see him pull this out of a hat, and I reckon that having such a
strong horror mind behind the helm makes all the post-modern deconstruction
work that much better. I can't remember where I read the phrase 'if you love
something, kill it', but Craven sets to his life's work with relish and a large
butcher's cleaver, and the results are very successful. This was actually the
first horror I've watched by myself since I began blogging, and yeah, I managed
a number of jumps. So all good on the horror front, and it can be largely
credited to Mr. Wes' confident management.
Our cast are exceptional. Neve Campbell is complex and
tortured as Sidney, and her seriously toxic family issues add a solid layer of
characterisation. She handles being terrified well, but she can also pull of
the whole strong, independent woman vibe that develops in so many characters
who are the last to survive their film's particular spate of deaths. Rose
McGowan acquits her role as the best friend well with the right balance of
concern and 'maybe she's just acting it up a bit...'. Old Ulrich is equally
appropriate as he treads a fine line between murder suspect and soft/tenderest
lover, and the other members of the best friendship group that anyone could
have get the job done (especially Jamie Kennedy as Randy - what a name... what
a top bloke). Rounding out the major players are David Arquette as McGowan's
older brother and the local deputy , who boasts an enviably cute repartee with
Courtney Cox as the local reporter/minx, who shares a little unfinished
business with Sidney.
The back-up are also seriously talented. The shooting from
DP Mark Irwin who worked on Cronenberg's early work is nicely noir - and the
shadows conceal some scares well. Editor Patrick Lussier keeps it tight, and
plays to the expectations of the genre to really highlight the act of
quasi-criticism on screen. But the stand out is undoubtedly Marco Beltrami's
debut film score, which - while it plays to some horror staples like the
crescendoing strings - is truly unique in its overall role for the film. They
put out a call for something that felt 'new', 'fresh' and 'wonderful', and they
found exactly that. It still manages to feels modern almost two decades on,
with lashings of Morricone's influence in amongst choral arrangements and
there's a raw energy that throbs underneath throughout. The track Trouble in
Woodsboro (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tg8beHZSpqc&feature=plcp) was a
particular stand out for me, just in the way it brings up the tension generated
in the unfortunate school that appears to have been cursed by some gruesome
deaths. I'm actually somewhat surprised that it didn't get an Oscar nod, but
Beltrami has landed a couple since then.
AND NOW, FOR SOME TIMELY SPOILERS (AND SERIOUSLY, DON'T READ
THESE IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THE MOVIE - THE TWIST IS ONE OF THE HIGHLIGHTS). Just
a fantastic reveal. Simply superb. I haven't witnessed many slashers to date,
so I'm not particularly qualified to make this claim, but this is one of the
smartest ideas in the history of watching teenagers getting cut up. Lovely
touches set up everyone as a viable suspect (for one, the school principal has
the same shoes as the killer), but then - there are two killers! Two! How many?
Two. Stu (an excellently mental Matthew Lillard) and Sidney's BF have been collaborating to get up to no good, and it
comes so far out of left field that it just works. What's more, Stu's rant
about a lack of motive is so deranged that it is properly scary in its own
right. The pair's plan is pretty genius (not that I condone making serial
murder plans in the slightest), and would've worked too (if it wasn't for those
meddling kids...). The twist elevates this film, and it was already pretty damn
good. Finally, there is a delightful kill that takes place in a garage - though
technically it occurs half in and half out of the garage. It needs to be seen rather
than described, so check it out for that moment alone.
To wrap this up, I really liked Scream. Its approach may
feel slightly familiar to those of who have seen meta classics like Shaun of
the Dead, Tucker & Dale vs Evil, Funny Games or Zombieland, but its a
classic for a reason. Context is key, yet it transcends that to still be
incredibly relevant and enjoyable today. Scream gets 7 slices of a cake that
has been bisected through a centre point fourfold. And yeah, I like cake. So
bite me.
I grew up on this series in the 90s. Still haven't seen Scream 4 yet...
ReplyDeleteHaving seen Scream 4 before I actually watched any of the other Screams (I was on a plane and pretty bored, so...), I found it okay. It kinda degenerates into a bit of a generic slasher but the denoument is great fun and it's good to see the gang back together.
Delete